What they say about themselves.
The intro, job and interests they publish themselves. A starting point, stated by whoever wrote it.
Before the first date, verify the public profile of the person you met. Stalky gathers public information into a report with sources and context.


Great chat. What’s next?
coffee this week?
thursday works for me :)


It’s good to feel.
It’s good to know.
You already know their sign, their favorite movie and that they love to travel. What they post outside the app tells you a little more.
Stalky verifies the public profile of the person you’re about to meet: digital presence, background and public records, gathered into a single report.
The report separates what the person says about themselves, what other public sources add and what can’t be attributed to them.
The intro, job and interests they publish themselves. A starting point, stated by whoever wrote it.
Projects, posts and public records that place their story in time, each with its origin and date.
A similar name isn’t the same person. What can’t be attributed is flagged and left out of the picture.
Explore a fictional report. Each reference shows its source, its date and what it can, or can’t, tell you.

São Paulo
“Slow coffee, architecture and a good conversation.”
A match is
just the start.
“How about coffee on Saturday?”
Illustrative invitation. No conversation was accessed.

Rafael M.Fictional profile · São Paulo
Demo reportThe bio mentions architecture. The introduction and the published project show the same track record outside the app. A record with a similar name has no confirmed link.
Rafael describes his work in architecture and his interest in city life.
This is information stated by the person who published the profile. It’s a starting point, not independent confirmation of the whole track record.
A project brings together images and notes on shared community spaces and adds to his professional introduction.
The project helps place the track record in time. Authorship, involvement and the publication date are part of the interpretation.
A public record shows a similar name. The details in this example don’t allow it to be linked to Rafael.
This reference is not attributed to Rafael. A shared name doesn’t establish identity and doesn’t support a conclusion about the person.
VerdictThis field doesn’t exist. The interpretation is yours.
Fictional people, sources and information. No real lookups are made.
Stalky doesn’t tell you whether to go or who to trust. It shows what’s public, where it comes from and what stays open. What you feel, and what you decide, is still yours.
What no Stalky report includes:
Public information and lawfully accessible sources, always with their origin and date.
Conversations, passwords and closed profiles are never accessed.
No score defines a person or decides a date for you.
The questions that may have already crossed your mind.
No. Your matches and conversations stay wherever you already have them. Stalky verifies someone’s public profile before a first date, so you show up with more context.
Public information: digital presence, background and public records, gathered from many sources into a structured report, with the origin and date of each reference. What can be found depends on what’s public.
No. Stalky never accesses private messages, closed profiles or confidential data. Getting to know someone better also starts with respecting boundaries.
No. Stalky never gives a verdict, score or label. The report shows what’s public and what stays open. Trust also takes conversation, time together and your own judgment.
No. Rafael, the sources and the events in the demo are fictional. The demo runs in your browser and doesn’t search for real people.
Explore the demoGo with curiosity. And a little more context.
Everything works for people and for companies. Pick the moment you’re in.